The AI here is so subtle that we sometimes miss it. Certain students might even use Grammarly to polish their writing in the editing phase. As students edit their work, the grammar check offers suggestions for what needs to change. When typing in a Google Document, the auto-fill option will often complete sentences for students. When doing research, the auto-fill option in Google narrows down the search for students. Students are already using more advanced AI in every phase of the writing process. If it seems as though your spell check and grammar checks on Word and Google Docs have improved over the years, it’s because they have. Some spell check software may also use natural language processing techniques to detect contextual errors, such as correctly spelled but misused words. While spell check software is not as advanced as the newer generations of AI, it still relies on machine learning and pattern recognition to improve its accuracy over time. But it is a primitive example of a smart algorithm. We don’t tend to think of spell check as AI. The truth is students are already using AI in their writing. What was once a tool for “cheating” is now a tool we use for writing. Instead of mindlessly clicking on the spellcheck, they were internalizing the feedback. It turned out this tool for cheating was actually providing students with immediate feedback on their spelling. There was a significant decrease in the number of spelling mistakes when comparing the initial student samples to the samples at the close of the semester. I then had students do a handwritten assessment at the end of the semester. I then counted the words and the number of spelling errors to find the rate of spelling mistakes. That semester, I had students submit a writing sample. If we relied too heavily on technology to fix spelling mistakes, would students ever bother to use correct spelling? If we let students use spellcheck, students would grow dependent on the tool and they would become awful spellers. When I was a new middle school teacher, I had several teachers warn me not to have my students use spellcheck. For now, the use of AI is forcing us to ask, “When is AI a learning tool and when is it cheating?” When Is It Cheating? It will continue to evolve in the upcoming years. It was similar to what I describe later in this article. Together, we planned out a solution that would include blending together AI-generated and student-generated text. Now I see that ChatGPT can generate responses to those high-interests prompts and I’m going to think hard about how treat AI as a tool.” I changed to high-interest prompts that you couldn’t find online. “When I realized students could just download whole essays, I started requiring students to do pre-writing that they turned in. “I’ve been through this before,” she adds. Sound familiar? These are many of the same concerns people have with AI. Moreover, Socrates was concerned that writing could be used to spread false ideas and opinions, and that it could be used to manipulate people. He believed that people who read a text would only be able to interpret it in the way that the author intended, rather than engaging in a dialogue with the ideas presented and coming to their own conclusions. One of the main reasons was that Socrates believed that writing would cause people to rely too much on the written word, rather than their own memories and understanding. We then talked about Socrates and his concerns about writing. But I’m just wondering how we might need to transform the essay.” Or they’re looking into programs that can detect ChatGPT in an essay. “I know of colleagues who are going back to the blue books and banning devices. “I’m not worried about AI in my humanities courses,” she said. Back in December, I showed ChatGPT to a friend of mine who is also a professor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |